National Institute of Military Justice
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
    • Staff
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • Gazette
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
    • Staff
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • Gazette
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us

CAAFlog

United States v. Dial

1/8/2023

7 Comments

 
Remember him?
An officer was sentenced Sunday to dismissal from the Army but no time in prison after being found guilty of attempting to sexually assault a teenage family member while visiting Disneyland Paris three years ago. [The prosecution had called for up to a five-year prison sentence.]
Lt. Col. Andrew J. Dial had faced three charges related to sexual assault, all of which he pleaded not guilty to during a nearly weeklong court-martial.
A jury of eight high-ranking officers found Dial not guilty of indecent conduct and three counts of abusive sexual contact, while convicting him Saturday on the attempted sexual assault charge.
Sua sponte the MJ
Pritchard described the verdicts as “inconsistent” after the jury announced them Saturday.
He questioned how there could be evidence to support a guilty verdict of attempted sexual assault if the accused also had been found not guilty of touching the family member’s breasts and genital area without consent.
Pritchard considered a motion of his own that would have rendered a not guilty verdict, but upon deliberation allowed sentencing to continue.
The MJ imposed the mandatory dismissal; which is good because otherwise he wouldn't have any appeal.
7 Comments
William Cassara
1/9/2023 13:00:28

Sadly, the reporting from S&S is incorrect. "A Dismissal will turn into a DD."

Reply
Philip Cave link
1/9/2023 13:03:25

Yep BB. As we know very few civilians know the difference and automatically assume they are the same designation.

Reply
Tami Mitchell
1/9/2023 13:15:15

I have to applaud the MJ for doing the right thing. Hopefully the conviction will get overturned on factual insufficiency.

Reply
Brenner Fissell
1/9/2023 16:56:10

What am I missing here? Why is it inconsistent to say there was an attempt but not a consummated offense?

Reply
Nathan Freeburg
1/9/2023 18:32:11

Brenner,

My best guess is that without the physical contact there wouldn’t be evidence of sexual intent. But the Stars and Stripes article really doesn’t give enough info.

Reply
Donald G Rehkopf, Jr.
1/10/2023 12:43:51

Well, at least he's got a preserved unanimity issue . . . . .

Reply
Patrick J. McLain link
1/11/2023 03:00:01

To my fellow military justice practitioners: I was the civilian defense counsel in US v LTC Dial. The finding as to the Charge of attempted sexual assault was inconsistent with the findings on the sexual assault charges and specifications. The military judge did a service to our client by highlighting that inconsistency even as he decided that the facts did not permit him to render a finding of Not Guilty as to the attempted sexual assault. I am very hopeful that the ACCA will see it the same way, much as did the NMCCA in Colonel Wilson's case (https://www.jag.navy.mil/courts/documents/archive/2019/WILSON_201800022_UNPUB.pdf#page=53) which was a much stronger case on the mertis than our own. Feel free to reach out by email if you want information about the trial or the litigation on the unanimity motion. Semper Fi, Patrick McLain patrick@patrickjmclain.com

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal views and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
    Picture
    Co-editors:
    Phil Cave
    Brenner Fissell
    Links
    ​

    UCMJ
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global Reform
    Army Lawyer

    CAAFlog 1.0
    CAAFlog 2.0

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022

    Categories

    All
    ByTheNumbers
    Case2Watch
    CrimLaw
    Evidence
    Fed. Cts.
    Habeas Cases
    IHL/LOAC
    Legislation
    MilJust Transparency
    NewsOWeird
    Opinions ACCA
    Opinions-ACCA
    Opinions AFCCA
    Opinions CAAF
    Opinions CGCCA
    Opinions NMCCA
    Sentenciing
    Sex Off. Reg.
    Sexual Assault
    Supreme Court
    Unanimous Verdicts

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly