National Institute of Military Justice
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
    • Staff
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • Gazette
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
    • Staff
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • Gazette
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us

CAAFlog

NDAA update

12/6/2022

4 Comments

 
Here is a link to the current NDAA proposals affecting military justice.

Random selection of court members.

Remaining prosecutorial for covered offenses removed from CA.

Expand the number of covered offenses.

A review of Titling actions.
4 Comments
Nathan Freeburg
12/7/2022 03:18:02

What I can’t tell from this is whether the intent is to resolve some of the remaining tension between the commander and prosecutor with regard to covered offenses. A notable one is PTC. My understanding is that as currently constituted the command will retain PTC authority — which theoretically serves as a forcing function with regard to preferral and referral and could bind the hands of prosecutors (this is more than theoretical when it comes to Marine commanders). This isn’t really an issue, generally speaking, with the Army as PTC decisions are usually made at the GCMCA level with SJA concurrence. But in the more decentralized services there is at least the possibility of an O-5 commander mucking with a covered offense prosecution by placing the service member in PTC.

Reply
Philip Cave link
12/7/2022 09:50:51

https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2022/12/after-spike-sexual-assaults-troops-real-change-finally-way/380554/

Reply
Tami Mitchell
12/7/2022 20:09:36

I'm interested in Section 548, precluding the Army from using $$ to move its CIDSAC course from Ft. Leonard Wood, MO.

Reply
Philip Cave link
12/7/2022 21:07:09

There are those of us who remember when BRAC was a big deal. At the time it was proposed that the NJS and AF school be consolidated at TJAGSA. Lot's of cost savings and better efficiency.

However, a certain Senator from a certain state--Alabama I think, didn't like that and wanted money for his state. So the AF school was moved to Alabama.

It's entirely possible someone from MO had obections to losing rice from the MO rice bowl? Or there could be other less political reasons.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
    Picture
    Co-editors:
    Phil Cave
    Brenner Fissell
    Links
    ​

    UCMJ
    CAAF
    -Daily Journal
    -Current Term Opinions
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    Joint R. App. Pro.
    Global Reform
    Army Lawyer
    JAG Reporter
    ​
    Army Crim. L. Deskbook

    CAAFlog 1.0
    CAAFlog 2.0

    Archives

    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022

    Categories

    All
    ByTheNumbers
    Case2Watch
    CrimLaw
    Evidence
    Fed. Cts.
    Habeas Cases
    IHL/LOAC
    Legislation
    MilJust Transparency
    NewsOWeird
    Opinions ACCA
    Opinions-ACCA
    Opinions AFCCA
    Opinions CAAF
    Opinions CGCCA
    Opinions NMCCA
    Sentenciing
    Sex Off. Reg.
    Sexual Assault
    Supreme Court
    Unanimous Verdicts

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly