"The military justice system was designed to maintain good order and discipline, strengthen national security, and achieve justice. After military leaders failed to effectively address the sexual assault crisis within the armed forces, Congress lost faith in this system. In response, Congress enacted sweeping legislative reform, transferring prosecutorial discretion for the most serious offenses from commanders to military lawyers. Unlike civilian prosecutions, most decisions within the military justice system have overwhelmingly favored one consideration: maintaining good order and discipline in the unit. While Congress’s reforms change who makes the decisions in many cases, they will have little effect unless military leaders also broaden the underlying criteria upon which their recommendations and decisions are made.
This Article proposes an innovative framework to assist military leaders in implementing a holistic approach to decision-making. Borrowing from the law of armed conflict, we propose a test that empowers decision makers to consider all the federal principles of prosecution and sentencing that Congress has repeatedly indicated should serve as touchstones for reform. When employing this framework, military justice decision makers will better account for the long-term impact on accused service members, society, and victims rather than solely focus on short-term deterrence within the unit. This proposal attempts to bring military prosecutions more in line with the criteria applied by civilian federal prosecutors and restore credibility in the military justice system, thereby enabling it to continue to do what it was designed to do." Read the full article here. “The more things change, the more they stay the same” is how I characterized the state of the military death penalty more than four years ago. Global Military Justice Reform: Death row SITREP (globalmjreform.blogspot.com). As 2022 draws to a close, that description remains apt. Ronald Gray has been a military death row inmate longer than anyone. He was sentenced to death on April 12, 1988, for a series of murders and rapes in the Fort Bragg area. On July 28, 2008, President George W. Bush approved his death sentence – the only time a President has approved a military death sentence since the Eisenhower administration. Gray currently has a habeas petition pending in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. That petition has been stayed since March 2022 as the court and the parties await rulings from the 10th Circuit in two cases that could provide guidance concerning Article III courts’ scope of review when considering collateral attacks to court-martial proceedings. Those two cases--Santucci (20-3149) and Bales (20-3167)—were each argued in September 2021, so decisions could be imminent. Hasan Akbar has been Gray’s neighbor the longest. Akbar was sentenced to death in 2005 for two specifications of premeditated murder and three specifications of attempted premeditated murder on March 22, 2003, when he attacked members of the 101st Airborne Division as they prepared to invade Iraq. SCOTUS denied his cert petition in 2005, making the case ripe for presidential action. (In the military justice system, the president must take the affirmative step of approving a death sentence to allow it to be carried out. UCMJ art. 57(a)(3), 10 U.S.C. § 857(a)(3). As Gray’s case demonstrates, however, even after presidential action, there will likely be a long delay before an execution actually occurs—if one ever does.) Master Sergeant Timothy Hennis, U.S. Army (Ret.), arrived on military death row in 2010, having been sentenced to death by a court-martial for three murders in 1985 for which he was originally convicted and sentenced to death in a North Carolina state court and then, following the North Carolina Supreme Court’s reversal on evidentiary grounds, acquitted. SCOTUS denied cert in 2021, making the case ripe for presidential action. It may be the most interesting case in the history of military justice. The most recent arrival on military death row is Major Nidal Hasan, who was sentenced to death in 2013 for 13 specifications of premeditated murder and 32 specifications of attempted murder arising from his 2009 attack against personnel at Fort Hood. ACCA affirmed the death sentence in 2020. United States v. Hasan, 80 M.J. 682 (A. Ct. Crim. App. 2020) (en banc). The case is currently being briefed at CAAF; appellant’s reply brief is due on Jan. 3, 2023. An oral argument during calendar year 2023 seems likely. No U.S. military execution has occurred since April 13, 1961. Plus ça change . . . . Dwight Sullivan[Disclaimer: The views presented are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of DoD or its components; they are made in the author’s personal capacity and should not be imputed to anyone else.] |
Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
Co-editors:
Phil Cave Brenner Fissell Links
CAAF -Daily Journal -2024 Ops ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA JRAP JRTP UCMJ Amendments to UCMJ Since 1950 (2024 ed.) Amendments to RCM Since 1984 (2024 ed.) Amendments to MRE Since 1984 (2024 ed.) MCM 2024 MCM 2023 MCM 2019 MCM 2016 MCM 2012 MCM 1995 UMCJ History Global Reform Army Lawyer JAG Reporter Army Crim. L. Deskbook J. App. Prac. & Pro. CAAFlog 1.0 CAAFlog 2.0 Archives
May 2024
Categories
All
|