|
The U.S. Supreme Court denied his petition in March. The QP in his petition is A violation of the public trial guarantee is structural error, defying harmless error review. Weaver v. Massachusetts, 582 U.S. 286, 299 (2017). In Waller v. Georgia, this Court said the remedy for a breach of the public trial guarantee “should be appropriate to the violation.” 467 U.S. 39, 50 (1984). This Court later explained in Weaver v. Massachusetts that the appropriate remedy is, generally, “automatic reversal.” Weaver, 582 U.S. at 299. The SG's Opposition restates the QP as Whether the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces permissibly declined to order a new trial on petitioner’s claim that his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial had been violated, where a military judge conducted a 34-minute ex parte hearing with petitioner and his standby defense counsel to discuss standby counsel’s motion to withdraw, which implicated petitioner’s privileged information and in which the judge agreed with petitioner’s position opposing withdrawal. Some media and commentators suggest that Hasan, a former Army major, was convicted and sentenced to death in 2013, but exhausted his legal appeals in April 2025. See, e.g., Lauren Keenan, Hegseth seeks death penalty for Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan. SAN, 24 September 2025.
1. I think the writer means to say that Sec. Hegseth is now seeking approval to schedule the execution of the death penalty, that's been adjudged and affirmed. Under the old Article 71(a), the President had to personally approve proceeding with the execution. The better question is when that might happen. In 1987-88, Gray was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. (He had already pled guilty to the crimes in state court where he was adjudged 8 life sentences.) On 28 July 2008, President G. W. Bush approved the execution under the old Article 71(a), the execution was scheduled for December 2008. However, that execution was and is still delayed, so here we are 35+ years after the court-martial. There are others in the pipeline--Hennis (United States v. Hennis, 79 M.J. 370 (C.A.A.F. 2020) cert. denied, Hennis v. United States, No. 20-301, 2021 U.S. LEXIS 193 (U.S. Jan. 11, 2021); Akbar (United States v. Akbar, 74 M.J. 364 (C.A.A.F. 2015) cert. denied, Akbar v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 41, 196 L. Ed. 2d 27, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 5191 (U.S., Oct. 3, 2016); but Gray remains the closest to a lethal injection at the moment. Like Bennett, Gray seems to have significant mental health issues. The Death Penalty Information Center lists maintains this concise case capsules of every modern military death case; the following dispositions reflect that compilation, supplemented with primary records where available.
1 Comment
Cloudesley Shovell
9/26/2025 12:56:13
It's time to admit that the judiciary has strangled the death penalty with a noose woven of procedure.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
Co-editors:
Phil Cave Brenner Fissell Links
SCOTUS CAAF -Daily Journal -2025 Ops ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA JRAP JRTP UCMJ Amendments to UCMJ Since 1950 (2024 ed.) Amendments to RCM Since 1984 (2024 ed.) Amendments to MRE Since 1984 (2024 ed.) MCM 2024 MCM 2023 MCM 2019 MCM 2016 MCM 2012 MCM 1995 UMCJ History Global Reform Army Lawyer JAG Reporter Army Crim. L. Deskbook J. App. Prac. & Pro. Dockets Air Force Art. 32. Trial. Army Art. 32. Trial. Coast Guard Art. 32. Trial. "Records." Navy-Marine Corps Art. 32. Trial. "Records." Archives
November 2025
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed