|
No. 26-0122/AR. U.S. v. Daniel J. Valdez. CCA 20220274. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues: I. WHAT IS THE PROPER STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES WHEN REVIEWING THE DECISION OF A COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS IN GRANTING OR DENYING RELIEF FOR EXCESSIVE POST-TRIAL DELAY USING ITS POWER UNDER ARTICLE 66(d)(2), UCMJ? II. WHETHER APPELLANT IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF FOR 952 DAYS OF POST-TRIAL DELAY WHERE THE GOVERNMENT AGREED APPELLANT'S SENTENCE SHOULD BE SET ASIDE. The ACCA is one page with the two standard short-form sentences. CAAF Supplement.
1 Comment
Anonymous
3/30/2026 23:14:36
If the Government agreed the sentence should be set aside, should the Appellant pursue an Article 69 application to the TJAG? He's likely still within the window provided by 69(b)(2). He probably has a better chance there then with CAAF. Leave a Reply. |
Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
Editor:
Phil Cave Links
SCOTUS CAAF -Daily Journal -2026 Ops Supplements (NB, these only stay on the site until oral argument is scheduled.) ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA JRAP JRTP UCMJ Index and Legislative History: Uniform Code of Military Justice. Amendments to UCMJ Since 1950 (2024 ed.) Amendments to RCM Since 1984 (2024 ed.) Amendments to MRE Since 1984 (2024 ed.) MCM 2024 MCM 2023 MCM 2019 MCM 2016 MCM 2012 MCM 1995 UMCJ History Global Reform Army Lawyer JAG Reporter Army Crim. L. Deskbook J. App. Prac. & Pro. Dockets Air Force Art. 32. Trial. Army Art. 32. Trial. Coast Guard Art. 32. Trial. "Records." Navy-Marine Corps Art. 32. Trial. "Records." Archives
May 2026
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed