National Institute of Military Justice
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
  • The Orders Project
  • Trans Rep. Project
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • News for You
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
  • The Orders Project
  • Trans Rep. Project
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • News for You
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us
  • Donate

CAAFlog

NIMJ Announces Creation of Three Chairs

5/9/2026

0 Comments

 
In recognition of NIMJ's continued expansion and increasing prominence, the Executive Board has created three Chairs to be held by those who, in the estimation of NIMJ, contribute as the most significant national voices in the field of military justice. Each chair honors historic figures in the development of military law.
The William Winthrop Chair in Military Law: 

​Eugene R. Fidell
​
This chair honors William Winthrop, a treatise writer and scholar from the 1800s who was among the first to systematize military law. The Supreme Court of the United States has referred to Winthrop as “Blackstone of Military Law,” Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 19, n. 38,  (1957). NIMJ accordingly confers this chair on the most learned and prominent living scholar of military justice in the United States: Eugene Fidell. Fidell, like Winthrop, spent decades convincing an often-reluctant legal academy (and bar) that military justice was a field worthy of serious study. Without these efforts, the field would have remained an intellectual backwater. Because of him, it is not. He has mentored a generation of law professors as well as hundreds of law students at Yale, where he regularly teaches military justice. 
The Ansell-Crowder Chair in Military Justice Reform:

Rachel VanLandingham

Military justice, like all law, is constantly in flux. From time to time, there are significant debates about its fundamental character. One of the most prominent of these debates occurred between two military lawyers after WWI: Major General Enoch H. Crowder & Brigadier General Samuel T. Ansell. Fred L. Borch, Military Justice in Turmoil: The Ansell-Crowder Controversy of 1917-1920, The Army Lawyer (March 2017). This chair honors these two men for spurring public deliberation about the future of military justice. NIMJ accordingly confers this chair on the most prominent scholarly advocate for the reform of military justice in the United States: Rachel VanLandingham. VanLandingham, like Ansell and Crowder, has been at the center of all significant debates about the future of military justice--advising Senators, Secretaries, and the public, where she frequently appears in the nation's most prominent media outlets. 
The Morgan-Larkin Chair

Vacant

This chair honors the architects of the Uniform Code of Military Justice: Edmund Morgan and Felix Larkin. Prior to the UCMJ, servicemembers' lives and liberty were subject to the archaic and draconian Articles of War (even up to WWII)--a legal regime that did not even have judges. The UCMJ created what is now known as CAAF.

The NIMJ Board welcomes nominations for this Chair from the public (please send email to [email protected]). 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
    Picture
    Editor:
    Phil Cave
    Links

    ​SCOTUS
    CAAF

    -Daily Journal

    -2026 Ops
    ​
    Supplements

    ​(NB, these only stay on the site until oral argument is scheduled.)

    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    JRAP
    JRTP

    UCMJ

    Index and Legislative History: Uniform Code of Military Justice.

    Amendments to UCMJ Since 1950 (2024 ed.)

    Amendments to RCM Since 1984 (2024 ed.)

    Amendments to MRE Since 1984 (2024 ed.)
    ​
    ​
    MCM 2024
    ​
    MCM 2023

    MCM 2019
    MCM 2016
    MCM 2012
    MCM 1995

    ​
    UMCJ History

    Global Reform
    Army Lawyer
    JAG Reporter
    ​
    Army Crim. L. Deskbook

    J. App. Prac. & Pro.

    Dockets

    Air Force

    Art. 32.
    Trial.

    Army

    Art. 32.
    Trial.

    Coast Guard

    Art. 32.
    Trial.
    ​"Records."

    Navy-Marine Corps

    Art. 32.
    Trial.
    "Records."

    Archives

    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022

    Categories

    All
    ByTheNumbers
    Case2Watch
    CrimLaw
    Evidence
    Fed. Cts.
    Habeas Cases
    IHL/LOAC
    Legislation
    MilJust Transparency
    NewsOWeird
    Opinions ACCA
    Opinions-ACCA
    Opinions AFCCA
    Opinions CAAF
    Opinions CGCCA
    Opinions NMCCA
    Readings
    Sentenciing
    Sex Off. Reg.
    Sexual Assault
    Supreme Court
    Unanimous Verdicts

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly