|
In recognition of NIMJ's continued expansion and increasing prominence, the Executive Board has created three Chairs to be held by those who, in the estimation of NIMJ, contribute as the most significant national voices in the field of military justice. Each chair honors historic figures in the development of military law. The William Winthrop Chair in Military Law: Eugene R. Fidell This chair honors William Winthrop, a treatise writer and scholar from the 1800s who was among the first to systematize military law. The Supreme Court of the United States has referred to Winthrop as “Blackstone of Military Law,” Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 19, n. 38, (1957). NIMJ accordingly confers this chair on the most learned and prominent living scholar of military justice in the United States: Eugene Fidell. Fidell, like Winthrop, spent decades convincing an often-reluctant legal academy (and bar) that military justice was a field worthy of serious study. Without these efforts, the field would have remained an intellectual backwater. Because of him, it is not. He has mentored a generation of law professors as well as hundreds of law students at Yale, where he regularly teaches military justice. The Ansell-Crowder Chair in Military Justice Reform: Rachel VanLandingham Military justice, like all law, is constantly in flux. From time to time, there are significant debates about its fundamental character. One of the most prominent of these debates occurred between two military lawyers after WWI: Major General Enoch H. Crowder & Brigadier General Samuel T. Ansell. Fred L. Borch, Military Justice in Turmoil: The Ansell-Crowder Controversy of 1917-1920, The Army Lawyer (March 2017). This chair honors these two men for spurring public deliberation about the future of military justice. NIMJ accordingly confers this chair on the most prominent scholarly advocate for the reform of military justice in the United States: Rachel VanLandingham. VanLandingham, like Ansell and Crowder, has been at the center of all significant debates about the future of military justice--advising Senators, Secretaries, and the public, where she frequently appears in the nation's most prominent media outlets. The Morgan-Larkin Chair
Vacant This chair honors the architects of the Uniform Code of Military Justice: Edmund Morgan and Felix Larkin. Prior to the UCMJ, servicemembers' lives and liberty were subject to the archaic and draconian Articles of War (even up to WWII)--a legal regime that did not even have judges. The UCMJ created what is now known as CAAF. The NIMJ Board welcomes nominations for this Chair from the public (please send email to [email protected]).
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
Editor:
Phil Cave Links
SCOTUS CAAF -Daily Journal -2026 Ops Supplements (NB, these only stay on the site until oral argument is scheduled.) ACCA AFCCA CGCCA NMCCA JRAP JRTP UCMJ Index and Legislative History: Uniform Code of Military Justice. Amendments to UCMJ Since 1950 (2024 ed.) Amendments to RCM Since 1984 (2024 ed.) Amendments to MRE Since 1984 (2024 ed.) MCM 2024 MCM 2023 MCM 2019 MCM 2016 MCM 2012 MCM 1995 UMCJ History Global Reform Army Lawyer JAG Reporter Army Crim. L. Deskbook J. App. Prac. & Pro. Dockets Air Force Art. 32. Trial. Army Art. 32. Trial. Coast Guard Art. 32. Trial. "Records." Navy-Marine Corps Art. 32. Trial. "Records." Archives
May 2026
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed