National Institute of Military Justice
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
  • Orders Project
    • Contact Us
    • Who We Are
    • Sourcebook
  • Trans Rep. Project
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • Gazette
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
  • Orders Project
    • Contact Us
    • Who We Are
    • Sourcebook
  • Trans Rep. Project
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • Gazette
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us
  • Donate

CAAFlog

New Naval Law Review Volume

3/5/2025

 
The newest volume of the Naval Law Review is noteworthy, with a nice balance of subject matters as well as seniority of authors.*

*The quality of this volume reinforces that the Army's claim that its journal is "the premier" journal for the subject matter is spurious--especially when the Military Law Review has been known to suppress articles that present viewpoints not favored by the Pentagon.
Picture
Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.
Scott
3/5/2025 15:11:54

Could you elaberate on the MLR's supression of unfavored viewpoints?

CAAFlog
3/5/2025 22:36:08

1. Credible reports of article acceptances at MLR rescinded after "management" learned of author/topic.
2. Larger absence of academic freedom at TJAG school:
a. -rescinded NIMJ's invite for joint conference in 2022 after management got word of LOAC as topic. Clear First Amendment violation, also violation of ABA standards on academic freedom.
b. -pressured student to revoke paper that had been accepted for a symposium at an actual law school because it revealed embarassingly high acquittal rates in military sexual assault cases
c. - on information and belief, TJAG school called UVA police on a protester standing on UVA land last month who was holding posters protesting JAG advice re: Gaza

Scott
3/6/2025 01:32:34

Thank you for the reply

Cloudesley Shovell
3/6/2025 09:58:18

1. One man's editorial discretion is another man's suppression of disfavored viewpoints. I'd need more information.
2. Does the TJAG school have any civilian faculty or is it all military? Beyond that, I'd like to hear your definition of academic freedom and how it should apply to this particular school.
2a. Sounds like bad form. What are they afraid of? Did NIMJ sue them for the clear 1A violation?
2b. Did the pressure work? Sounds like bad form again. Why should high acquittal rates be embarrassing? That's explained away by pointing to enormous political pressure to charge all accusations regardless of the probability of conviction, very much unlike how similar accusations are treated in other non-military jurisdictions.
2c. So what? Was the protester trespassing? I would suppose that the UVA police provide security for TJAG school. What's wrong with alerting the police to any possible security issue?

Carry on! and kind regards,
CS


Comments are closed.
    Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
    Picture
    Co-editors:
    Phil Cave
    Brenner Fissell
    Links

    ​SCOTUS
    CAAF

    -Daily Journal
    -2025 Ops
    ​
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    JRAP
    JRTP


    UCMJ

    Amendments to UCMJ Since 1950 (2024 ed.)

    Amendments to RCM Since 1984 (2024 ed.)

    Amendments to MRE Since 1984 (2024 ed.)
    ​
    ​
    MCM 2024
    ​
    MCM 2023

    MCM 2019
    MCM 2016
    MCM 2012
    MCM 1995

    ​
    UMCJ History

    Global Reform
    Army Lawyer
    JAG Reporter
    ​
    Army Crim. L. Deskbook

    J. App. Prac. & Pro.

    Dockets

    Air Force

    Art. 32.
    Trial.

    Army

    Art. 32.
    Trial.

    Coast Guard

    Art. 32.
    Trial.
    ​"Records."

    Navy-Marine Corps

    Art. 32.
    Trial.
    "Records."

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022

    Categories

    All
    ByTheNumbers
    Case2Watch
    CrimLaw
    Evidence
    Fed. Cts.
    Habeas Cases
    IHL/LOAC
    Legislation
    MilJust Transparency
    NewsOWeird
    Opinions ACCA
    Opinions-ACCA
    Opinions AFCCA
    Opinions CAAF
    Opinions CGCCA
    Opinions NMCCA
    Readings
    Sentenciing
    Sex Off. Reg.
    Sexual Assault
    Supreme Court
    Unanimous Verdicts

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly