National Institute of Military Justice
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
  • Orders Project
    • Contact Us
    • Who We Are
    • Sourcebook
  • Trans Rep. Project
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • Gazette
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • Officers
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellows
  • Orders Project
    • Contact Us
    • Who We Are
    • Sourcebook
  • Trans Rep. Project
  • CAAFlog
  • Global Reform
  • Library
    • Amicus Briefs
    • Position Papers & Letters
    • Reports
    • Gazette
    • Miscellaneous
    • General Military Law
  • Links
    • State Codes
    • Non-DoD Organizations
    • Foreign Systems
  • Prizes
  • Contact Us
  • Donate

CAAFlog

Courts of Criminal Appeals

10/11/2024

 

Coast Guard

United States v. Nenni. It took 200 days from sentencing to CCA docketing. Compare this case to Raines, below, which took 241 days.
The Government offers three affidavits and a detailed chronology and explanation of the reasons for the delay. It concedes that some of the delay is attributable to mistakes made while obtaining a verbatim transcript and compiling the record. This led to the military judge not receiving the record for review and verification until 164 days from trial, already 14 days beyond the Tucker standard. This included unnecessary delay, most notably 62 days from sentencing to getting a contract approved and transmitted so that work on a transcript could finally begin.

As the Government also points out, however, when the military judge received the record, both she and the court reporter responsible for compiling the record were in the midst of a complex, 29-day contested court-martial. The military judge nevertheless worked diligently with the court reporter to identify and correct errors, eventually verifying a complete record 198 days after trial.

Given all the circumstances, we do not view the delay as onerous. The record includes a 1,684-page transcript, with sealed portions, and a total of 184 exhibits, some of which are sealed. Post-trial processing must balance quality and attention to detail with speediness. Although there were, undoubtedly, missteps that slowed the process, we acknowledge the efforts of the military judge, court reporter, and other Government personnel to identify and address errors to ensure delivery of a complete, quality record to this Court.

Navy-Marine Corps

United States v. Raines. "​Our decision should not be read as an endorsement of the post-trial processing of this case."
To illustrate this point, we note that “in late 1860, the short-lived but nationally famous Pony Express hit full stride.” Using relays of horses stationed twenty-five miles apart, a package could travel from Saint Joseph, Missouri to San Francisco, California in just eight days. While we will not require posttrial processing to move at the speed of the precursor to the telegraph, the Government must do better than it did here.

Comments are closed.
    Disclaimer: Posts are the authors' personal opinions and do not reflect the position of any organization or government agency.
    Picture
    Co-editors:
    Phil Cave
    Brenner Fissell
    Links

    ​SCOTUS
    CAAF

    -Daily Journal
    -2025 Ops
    ​
    ACCA
    AFCCA
    CGCCA
    NMCCA
    JRAP
    JRTP


    UCMJ

    Amendments to UCMJ Since 1950 (2024 ed.)

    Amendments to RCM Since 1984 (2024 ed.)

    Amendments to MRE Since 1984 (2024 ed.)
    ​
    ​
    MCM 2024
    ​
    MCM 2023

    MCM 2019
    MCM 2016
    MCM 2012
    MCM 1995

    ​
    UMCJ History

    Global Reform
    Army Lawyer
    JAG Reporter
    ​
    Army Crim. L. Deskbook

    J. App. Prac. & Pro.

    Dockets

    Air Force

    Art. 32.
    Trial.

    Army

    Art. 32.
    Trial.

    Coast Guard

    Art. 32.
    Trial.
    ​"Records."

    Navy-Marine Corps

    Art. 32.
    Trial.
    "Records."

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022

    Categories

    All
    ByTheNumbers
    Case2Watch
    CrimLaw
    Evidence
    Fed. Cts.
    Habeas Cases
    IHL/LOAC
    Legislation
    MilJust Transparency
    NewsOWeird
    Opinions ACCA
    Opinions-ACCA
    Opinions AFCCA
    Opinions CAAF
    Opinions CGCCA
    Opinions NMCCA
    Readings
    Sentenciing
    Sex Off. Reg.
    Sexual Assault
    Supreme Court
    Unanimous Verdicts

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly